AES 1y ago • 100%
I am using an Intel NUC with 32gig ram. Super efficient.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Man... Perez. RB would be struggling to win the WDC and WCC with 2 of them.
AES 1y ago • 66%
This is the way.
AES 1y ago • 100%
A fake taxi like they say.
AES 1y ago • 100%
It can Arch.
AES 1y ago • 100%
But few can be relocked.
AES 1y ago • 100%
If you are on Android I recommend NZB360 as companion app. It's freaking awesome.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Wow, thanks for that.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Awesome!
AES 1y ago • 100%
Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/
AES 1y ago • 93%
Yes ofc they can. The Wireguard protocol is not designed to be hidden.
Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/
AES 1y ago • 100%
Yes there is a difference between https traffic.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Very nice!
AES 1y ago • 100%
Yeah a fork, it's not the same dev.
AES 1y ago • 100%
CoolWorldsLab
AES 1y ago • 100%
Chocolatey
Edit: choco can team up with ansible, works really well.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Cool, thanks for sharing the solution!
AES 1y ago • 100%
Opnsense or openwrt devices.
AES 1y ago • 100%
Yeah, me too. Flatpaks and distrobox.
Lemmy: "that is a fair point" Reddit: "you fucking moron"
I have set up a small Lemmy instance (Docker + NPM) for testing purposes, and I was wondering if it is possible to only expose the activitypub to the internet and hide the Lemmy UI behind my personal wireguard VPN. So the UI is only accessible on the local LAN.