Comradeship // Freechat BenEarlDaMarxist • 8mo ago • 100%

Just gonna ask something involving anti-communist propaganda.

Is there like, a good amount of cases where an anti-communist talking point gets exaggerated or flanderized over time? The only one I can think of rn is the one with the Uyghurs thing in China where it went from a "cultural genocide" to an "actual genocide" according to these fuckers. Just curious if there are more cases of this shit.

Comradeship // Freechat BenEarlDaMarxist • 11mo ago • 100%

Has anyone here experienced younger siblings using discriminatory language just to annoy their older siblings, or is it just me?

I'm just going to share an experience by saying that I have a younger brother (not namedropping anything) and I have regarded him in most of my life in a neutral-leaning-negative light, he's annoying sure, but he's not like really shit, or at least, I *had* until he started calling me a "black person", "blackie", and "monkey" (which I'm pretty sure is often compared with to black people in a really dehumanizing light) just to get a rise out of me, which first of all, is not accurate at all (I'm Asian), and second, it sounds like he was being genuinely racist against Africans just to piss me the hell off, "at the very least he isn't saying slurs" I thought to myself, months later, he recently started calling me the ***fucking N-word***, really, really casually, just to piss me the fuck off, I don't know if he's being genuinely racist or just wanting to get a reaction out of me (I'm 75% sure it's the latter), but even then, using slurs just to get a reaction out of someone is tasteless at best, and outright derogatory at worst. I'm just curious if anyone else has experienced the same thing as me.

Anyways, free and democratic Ukraine is the obvious underdog good guy in the Russian-Ukraine conflict with the Putler Russian dictatorship is the comically evil bad guy.

Comradeship // Freechat BenEarlDaMarxist • 2y ago • 0%

_______ a liberal and a fascist ______.

Fill in the blanks. Any answer is correct!

Comradeship // Freechat BenEarlDaMarxist • 2y ago • 100%

Describing class traitors in Marxist analysis:

# Proletarian Class Traitors - Probably propagandized to serve the interests of the bourgeoisie - Due to the proletariat being the majority class, expect these class traitors to show up at least once. - They think they're gonna end up like the masters on the top, at best, they're gonna end up as petit-bourgeoisie (a class that ain't gonna last long in capitalist society) - Wholeheartedly believes in all the capitalist nonsense (like say, the pull up by your bootstraps, the bourgeoisie are benevolent saviors, and free market brings freedom to a country kinda shit) - Cringe af (and probs a reactionary). # Bourgeois Class Traitors - Is aware they're born in privilege, goes to fight for the interests of the proletariat anyway. - Due to the bourgeoisie being the minority class, don't expect them to show up more than a few times. - They know that their class is gonna stay on top no matter what under capitalist society, fights for the people's revolution anyways due to not being a greedy piece of shit like a good chunk of the owner class are. - Wholeheartedly believes in the ideals, principles, and beliefs of scientific socialism (y'know, dialectical materialism, the worker's dictatorship over the owner's dictatorship and whatever tf anarchism's doing, and needing a state to fight reactionary and capitalist aggression post-revolution) - Based af (and probably the opposite of a reactionary)

Comradeship // Freechat BenEarlDaMarxist • 2y ago • 0%

How would you guys describe socialism and capitalism in the dumbest way possible?

Mainly just asking you guys, but here's my take: # Capitalism: * An economic system in which individuals privately own the buildings that produces stuff and services. * Their form of democracy is a "democracy of the minority" at best, and at worst, is a dictatorship disguising itself as a democracy. Has that illusion of choice shit going on for the majority class. * Can't get rid of the top man "running the place" due to him/her owning the deed of the building. Sad, can we get an F in the chat for the workers having their labor exploited by this POS. # Socialism: * An economic in which the workers who do the shit for the business run the building that provide goods and services. * Their form of democracy is *real* democracy. In which that the majority class, actually have an impact on what they want in society. The minority somewhat gets to live, but not without a gun on the head and a sign next to it saying: "we will not hesitate to shoot you if you give in to ~~your hedonistic greed~~ the profit motive." * Can get rid of the person just sitting their and owning the deed to the building, the least harmful method is via democratic vote and choice on who gets to lead the operation, or if the deed owner ain't gonna give up his title of "leader" well, we shoot the guy if he/she reacts with malicious violence.