If this is illegal, does that mean Cards Against Humanity's recent voting stunt is also? Edit: thanks for the drive-by down vote, it really doesn't help the discourse. I'm mainly wondering if CAH has opened themselves up to a bunch of legal liability.

LET'S ALL LOVE LAIN

STCTD?

We're already paying more money for worse care. So dumb.

It may have been because Poe was one of the few authors I read as a kid, and seeing what they did with the stories tickled my brain in all the right ways.

I had like a good month long period where I'd just randomly stop whatever I was doing and think to myself, "God DAMN Fall of the House of Usher was SO GOOD."

Yes.

Underage people cannot consent.

• Ring zero
• Bootkit/Rootkit
• Attacker in the middle
• Intercepting proxy
• Daemon

That's what the Senate is for. Two senators per state regardless of population. Wyoming has as much of a say as California does.

I'm also interested to learn more. Quick search yielded nothing, so I dunno what they're referencing.

God damn I love this movie.

Please, for the love of all that is good, just give us a Linux client for Drive.

...Signal's never had federation, though. That's been one of the biggest sources of criticism toward Moxie's design decisions for the platform.

Pound a lot of liquid IV or similar electrolyte supplement. You should be able to dilute enough to fly under the detection thresholds but still have enough vitamin/mineral content that it doesn't get rejected. Had this happen to someone I know who was smoking daily and had a prescription for an amphetamine ADD med, neither showed on their test results.

I wouldn't rely on the size of the address space to provide security. It's possible to find hosts through methods other than brute force scanning. I remember seeing a talk from a conference (CCC? DEF CON? I can't remember) where they were able to find hosts in government IPv6 address space (might have been DOD?) through stuff like certificate transparency logs and other DNS side channels.

Man, I need to go find that talk now....

Edit: I don't think this is the one I saw previously but is in a similar vein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AayifEqLbhI

I laughed.

Scenario time: A loved one has recently passed away, and I want to find all the photos I have of them. I would love to be able to have a local AI perform facial recognition to help me find these photos. The classification and tagging info doesn't get fed into surveillance capitalist garbage, and I'm still able to benefit.

"What is this level of grand security..." Enumerated here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

Once manufacturers can implement those things, then you will have an alternative to Google hardware for running Graphene. I'm not telling people to trust anything, don't put words in my mouth.

Who is PrivacyPhones and why should I believe they are in any way affiliated with Graphene?

GrapheneOS has defined a set of security standards for their operating system which have hardware requirements. These standards have been published and there have been efforts to engage with hardware manufacturers to adopt the required hardware. Blame the manufacturers for skimping on security, rather than Graphene being unwilling to compromising their values.

I wouldn't because I am not a dev. I stay in my wheelhouse and don't try to pitch features as something they aren't.