And one doesn't even need two NICs, right.

As others said, both work just fine with any GPU and Intel had serious issues lately with crashes. I'd say go with AMD unless you want higher power usage as Intel chips fare worse when it comes to perf/watt metrics. That said Intel CPUs might have an advantage at single threaded loads, but again, at much higher power use. AMD also tends to keep CPU sockets for longer thus less motherboard changes are required if you upgrade the CPU. You might also consider reading reviews on serious technical websites as it might give you inside into what performance and prices to expect.

Update: On more (implicitly expressed consequence) - due to Intel's much higher power requirements, they are more difficult to cool down - more expensive (air) coolers and quite possibly water cooling required.

Yeah, both feels like password manager issues. Which one do you use?

Nothing new that China supports Russia and that the West is trying to leverage this against China because of economic and political competition. Yeah, it's not about justice or anything like that, it's just Western interests. Nothing else.

Mostly agree with what others said, it's fine for me.

Perhaps just a subjective opinion that isn't bound to technology - I find moderators much more trigger happy when it comes to deletion and even banning.

Uh, they are less stable that li-ion, like fires? Ouch.

And yet, soldiers survived that point blank blast. Amazing.

What's the problem with combination of manager and passkeys?

Ha, right. Seems that distinguishing between power and energy is really a hard task (for journalists).

Yeah, I was hoping for other less toxic and more nature friendly ones, too.

Sadly no info whatsoever on batteries.

It literally says in first paragraph "...in Sweden to deploy 211 MW / 211 MWh..."

Said an EU citizen, right.

€16bn buys you roughly half of a 1GW nuclear reactor these days

Not necessarily. Slovenia is planning to get 1,6GW of power for that money. They included current experience (Hinkley and others) in account - but who knows.

When one looks at current state, Germany is pretty much on pollution side while France is always on the green side. Renewables can get you so far but at the same time force you to cover their power with gas/coal based power plants when sun isn't shinning and wind isn't blowing. Both of them are still generating plenty of CO2. Bottom line is that unless Germany comes out with plenty more of co2 free renewables and a huge energy storages (specially this is the problem, you can slap more solar panels easily), it will still emit plenty of CO2 no matter what.

Mobility is not electrified enough and there’s not enough public transit. Heating is not electrified enough.

Yea, but not really. Heating is mostly used during winter when sun isn't as its best. And cars are mostly being charged during the night, when sun isn't shinning either. Perhaps if hydro and wind were enough, but I doubt it they can power such at scale energy demand. OTOH if there were nuclear energy backed, then yes.

I'd understand the thread as author intended. Just my 5 cents. And honestly, it's time to talk openly about it, even though the thread could diverge - in that case, weed the offensive comments, not censor beforehand.

Hi, ok, while I disagree, thanks for letting me know. Perhaps we need some rage to end the horrors going on in Middle east...