moreover, do jungian concepts shape the understanding that grounds "a.i."?
tetranomos 4w ago • 100%
since you know by 2020 that modeling categorical logic and categorical truth tables tell you less about the "trumper" than the non-trumper do you [really] want to risk it, framing the trumper, at least, as a "moron" who can't muster the "IQ" points (btw, was everybody jumping on that that new EQ+AQ+SQ wagon to own the Young-Girl's war on war)?
that paradoxical circumstance where trump acts the fool, because he knows you'll take the bait, in front of his base, amplified by algorithmic blunders: socialism and barbarism/annihilation, have always lived side-by-side. your mythology of technology only cyclically prevents you from seeing that.
tetranomos 1mo ago • 100%
he's no brian leiter.
tetranomos 1mo ago • 100%
one cat's nip is another cat's jazz
tetranomos 1mo ago • 100%
but it allows for some people to type out one-liners and generate massive blobs of text at the same time that they could be doing their jobs. /codecraft
tetranomos 1mo ago • 75%
- metacognitive myopia explained why people didn't/couldn't update their beliefs about the existence of "weapons of mass destruction etc".
- dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution "comrade kamala" (i.e., he's implying hypocrisy when he doesn't understand what lenin's use of the term "prostitute" meant).
- playing the fool until you can't (i.e., making his base feel insightful and "seen" as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
- from (3) somewhere in his administration they're letting the would-be "fool" base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see "Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information".
(if you Select All and copy really fast behind an adblocker you can get all the text)
tetranomos 2mo ago • 100%
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance
tetranomos 2mo ago • 100%
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn't, as what a settlement might imply.
tetranomos 2mo ago • 25%
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
tetranomos 4mo ago • 80%
have books become too heavy for men?
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
doctrine of double effect hours
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
since 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third "a.i." winter?
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
the gettier problem
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
mmo festive "sexual" cartesian theatres coming for disney world from japan with loving kindness
tetranomos 4mo ago • 50%
South Park's comedic antics will be lost on droves of beautiful souls unless The Critic is rebooted.
tetranomos 4mo ago • 100%
algorithms of oppression. noble.