uzi 4mo ago • 19%
uzi 4mo ago • 76%
There are good free market capitalists who are trying to expose corporatism to distinguish it from capitalism with healthy competition that makes locally owned services and businesses, some of those even get to know their customers. Coporations believe they are entitled to everybody else's money while only doing the token minimal for very large amounts of money.
uzi 4mo ago • 12%
uzi 4mo ago • 25%
The case sounds right, because it is a crime against humanity to hurt someone's feelings. I would assume that using words deemed offensive would merrit the death penalty.
uzi 4mo ago • 9%
It's not self hatred, it's a psychological ploy to turn raise into a fetish to intentionally sabatoge the very people they claim to support.
Black Lives Matter burned down black own businesses and swindle money from black people through donations that went to the Democrat party. White power.
Antifa who beat conservatives and and any non-whites who like Republicans. White power.
The Spanish mass immigration is to have them as slaves to pick their crops. White power
Look at all race discussions as a physchological tacttic that signals only the white savior can fix everyone's struggles.
uzi 4mo ago • 20%
Will Disney fire 100% of their white exployees, fire white CEO, fire white board member, and make Disney a 100% non-white corporation, and only hire 100% non-white actors in Hollywood so there are zero white actors and zero white artists in Disney movies and TV?
uzi 4mo ago • 14%
I will never report any person I know if they do something that is within the consitution but has a criminal conviction, there is no crime. If a convict has a gun, I ignore the law and treat them as being within their rights if the gun is currently being used in a criminal matter.
uzi 4mo ago • 14%
And after they have been released from incarceration, I treat them as still posessing every and all constituional rights.
uzi 4mo ago • 8%
And I reject all of that. I say a felon can still vote, hold office, and own guns. When I find out a convict has firearms or guns, I do not report them because I protect their eternal right to own guns, unrestricted, regardless of a record.
uzi 4mo ago • 11%
uzi 4mo ago • 11%
Every and all kinds of convictions will never negate or nulify consituional rights. A criminal still keeps 100% of consituional rights. No law restricts a constituional right.
uzi 4mo ago • 11%
uzi 4mo ago • 11%
I reject a felony affecting individual rights. I will never report anyone with a conviction for possessing guns.
uzi 4mo ago • 18%
I reject the idea that any criminal convition nulifies an absolute right.
Someone is convicted of assault and battery, armed robbery, homocide, etc., they may still possess firearms. Laws do not prevent mass murder, street gangs have unlimited fire power, blackmarket sellers don't ask why someone is buying it, thereby people are butt studpid to believe a law will forever eliminate homicide.
It's a cultural problem in society, not a gun problem. If I had a neighbour who was in prison and now has multiple firearms for sport shooting, I might try to be friends with that person to go shooting together and listen to how they changed their life from their prison days.
uzi 4mo ago • 20%
uzi 4mo ago • 20%
How will a supreme ruling prevent individuals selling illegal firearms? I support 100% of the population owning illegal firearms because it is aninanimate object, only the manner in how it is discharged that makes it a crime. If I find out someone bought a black market weapon, I treat it as a legal valid purchase. Society's problem with guns is a cultural problem and a moral problem, not a gun problem.
uzi 4mo ago • 40%
uzi 4mo ago • 16%
Veganism is an opinion or philosophy, it does not come from any doctrinal teachings with historical writings to count as a belief system on the same level as someone who can only eat certified kosher food.
Being vegan is recent fad or trendy thing from the perspective of world history. Nutritionally, veganism is not healthy without an extensive amount of supplements. Before corporations could manufacture suppliments, everybody needed to eat a few animal products for basic health. In there West though, there is definitely way too much consumption of meat but pescatarian is very healthy.
uzi 4mo ago • 20%
uzi 4mo ago • 14%
Will you outlaw unions, ban unions in society to protect jobs? Will you support a single page flat tax?
If the federal government has been obligated to pay out and reimburse people who were severely injured or damaged from vaccines, why should be get any injections? https://tnc.news/2024/04/30/only-6-of-vaccine-injury-claimants-paid/
Since the bulk of you in this group are ideologues, how do you discern between respectful disagreement with someone and if someone is pushing conformity to only one acceptable viewpoint and belief?
Now that we can create and delete usernames at will, do people have any concerns about giving people they meet their Signal ID? I have no fears of it. In fact, my Signal is oozic.35 if anyone wanta to message me.
Is everybody still a strong supporter for anyone getting their first covid vaccine that they should should still get their first vaccine shot if never had a vaccine?
Why does it seem that people actively avoid expressing disaagreements on what somone says when they are out somewhere having a conversation? Why arwe people more concerned about trying to sound nice rather than being honest? It's not provactive or antagonizing to simply say "I can't agree with you on that, I disagree." I suspect that if someone articulates the reasoning behind their disagreement, a lot of people would not be bothered by it, unless someone wants everybody to believe the same things and are easily disturbed by contrary points of views.
Does anyone know why every release is not available through F-Droid? For example F-Droid has version 5.5.2 and the latest stable is 5.5.5. In the buildlog it looks like F-Droid gets the soirce code for every release. It assume it is not successfully compiled in order for it to never end up being released.
Remember kids, geographical grammer is offensive.
Why does it seem people online will openly degrade anyone but out in public everone runs from confrontation? Why is there such social paranoia in public and too scared to socialize with strangers but will happily insult everyone online? If people are so lonely, why don't they talk with people whil le they are out and exchange contact info? It seems more enjoyable talking with immigrants and better to avoid Canadians. I'm not bothered by dealing with someone talking stupid or if someone wants a friendly hug, it's quite easy to have a good time with strangers and I have no concrns about giving my number to continue talking.
"The use of this powerful law was unauthorized because the legal threshold to use the law was not met."
"The use of this powerful law was unauthorized because the legal threshold to use the law was not met."
How is such a ruling possible?